![]() |
|
| Dow Public Relations Dow executives are acutely aware of many of the risks Dow products create. Dow lobbying and power brokering are part of the the company's strategy in response to those risks - in pursuit of regulatory leniency and reduced liability. As seen in Dow’s home base of Midland, Michigan where Dow’s corporate sponsorship strongly influences most local politicians, and many community organizations. The American Chemistry Council-- the lobbying arm of the chemical industry in Washington, D.C. receives millions in contributions from Dow. These corporate sponsorships and political contributions block citizen’s efforts to make corporations accountable for the external costs of their production. Dow is able to take advantage of a regulatory atmosphere in which, regulators rely on private data to ensure the health and environmental safety of a product. Private chemical and pharmaceutical companies are allowed to submit their own data on the health and efficacy of these chemicals and drugs. Dow participates in this process -- sponsoring studies and acquiring data and in some instances controlling the release of the data. For example, according to Public Citizen in a report released in May, 2005 “Federal Legislation: and the Winners Are ….” Dow claims it was not aware of the health hazards linked to exposure to asbestos until the late 1960s. But internal company documents show that Dow was well aware of the risks to asbestos exposure well before the late 1960s. The links below are designed to help you see through some of Dow’s most misleading corporate public relations efforts. Dow Chemical Spent $200,000 on Lobbying
by Associated Press, Forbes.com August 21st, 2007 In the first half of 2007 alone.
Corporate Science
by Peter Montague A look at how Dow sponsors studies and scientists to back their positions, prevents studies that could harm well-selling products and discredits scientists that don’t share their industry-view, or even sometimes current orthodox scientific positions if they fail to agree with what’s in Dow’s interest. Generally, a look at how Dow tries to influence the way scientific debates progress.
Dow Chemical--Multiple Personalities: Front Groups
Infact 1997 & 98 Accounts of how Dow uses front groups to lobby against consumer rights while up-front supporting whatever the public wants (after determining this empirically).
Hiding a Lobby Behind a Name: Why Not Truth in Labeling For Interest Groups?
by Howard Kurtz, Washington Post The press releases arrive in the mail nearly every day. The Committee for National Security. The Committee for an Effective Congress. The American Council on Science and Health. The Committee for Energy Awareness. The U.S.A. Foundation.
The names are patriotic-sounding, forward-looking, uplifting. And they all have something in common: They don't tell you a heck of a lot about what the group stands for.
Ecological Double Agents
by Sharon Beder, Ecological Double Agents, Australian Science, Vol. 19, no 1, February 1998, pp19-22. Sharon Beder describes the way corporations and industry associations use front groups to put their views into the mouths of others who are portrayed as independent scientists or public interest advocates.
|
| Fair Use Statement | Disclaimer | Contact Copyright © The Truth About Dow (1994-2004). All Rights Reserved. |